Re: network has gone down again, and I cannot figure out why

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  wrote:

Also, looking at what logwatch reports, I noticed the following:

Packages Erased:
   bind-config
Another WAG but it appears to have been replaced by:

Packages Installed:
   sane-backends-libs.i386 1.0.18-2.fc5
   kernel.i686 2.6.17-1.2187_FC5
   caching-nameserver.i386 30:9.3.2-33.fc5 <-- This
   libgconf-java.i386 2.12.4-2.fc5

Sort of responding to my own post... Given the above, I found the following output from yum today to be quite amusing:

Added 63 new packages, deleted 51 old in 28.11 seconds
Resolving Dependencies
--> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
---> Downloading header for bind-config to pack into transaction set.
bind-config-9.3.2-20.FC5. 100% |=========================| 35 kB 00:00 ---> Package bind-config.i386 30:9.3.2-20.FC5 set to be updated
--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: bind = 30:9.3.2-20.FC5 for package: bind-config
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: bind = 30:9.3.2-20.FC5 is needed by package bind-config
Thu Sep 28 12:50:31 MDT 2006
[root@spindle ~]# rpm -q bind
bind-9.3.2-33.fc5
[root@spindle ~]# rpm -q bind-config
package bind-config is not installed

Looks like some part of FC5 still thinks bind-config is needed. I have a funny feeling I'll have to figure out why or yum updates will fail on bind-config dependencies until I do.

Cheers,
Dave

--
Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles.
-- Ambrose Bierce


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux