On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Ed Greshko wrote:
Matthew Saltzman wrote:Thanks for the explanation. That tends to confirm my conjecture and it seems to answer at least some of the questions that came up here. (Top posting because it's just an acknowledgement, so no need to scroll down...)Then trim.... :-)
Then you get people complaining that they can't tell what the thread was about 8^(.
-- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs
