On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 16:07 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > As a matter of interest, lshal seems to give more info > (at least on my ThinkPad T23) than dmidecode. I didn't know about that command, but you're right, it does produce lots more output. Not sure that much of it makes sense to me, though. ;-) -- (Currently running FC4, occasionally trying FC5.) Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
