Re: Starting dhcpd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Around 07:52pm on Sunday, September 03, 2006 (UK time), Norm scrawled:

> I was not aware of this log file, my guess is the problem may be
> contained in these lines.  The format of my number netmask combination
> is correct.
> Sep  3 11:46:34 linux dhcpd: For info, please visit
> http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/ 
> Sep  3 11:46:34 linux
> dhcpd: /etc/dhcpd.conf line 10: expecting key name. 
> Sep  3 11:46:34 linux dhcpd:    key ; S
> ep  3 11:46:34 linux dhcpd:         ^
> Sep  3 11:46:34 linux dhcpd: /etc/dhcpd.conf line 13: subnet
> 1pv4 numbers removed " netmask 255.255.255.0: bad subnet
> number/mask combination.

OK, can you post your dhcpd.conf file as well - it seems that the
problem is there.

> <p>Norm Ryder<br>250 544-2158<br>Be environmentally responsible Keep
> Computers out of Land Fills<br>
> <a href="http://sios.ca/feeds/general/landfill.htm";>
> http://sios.ca/feeds/general/landfill.htm</a><br>
> <span style="text-transform: uppercase;"><b>Secure-It-OnSite Computer
> Security and more</b></span> <a
> href="http://www.sios.ca/feeds/sios.xml";> <img src="rss.gif" alt="RSS
> Feed"></a><a
> href="http://sios.ca/feeds/sios.xml";>http://sios.ca/feeds/sios.xml</a>
> </p>

Your sig looks crap when the email is viewed as text.

Steve

-- 

A:  Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q:  Why is top-posting a bad thing?

 20:49:44 up 15 days, 22:15,  1 user,  load average: 0.23, 0.10, 0.03

Attachment: pgpTQN5yJojqE.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux