Re: Sendmail bug to flaw: should I file another bug report?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Sendmail bug to flaw: should I file another bug report?
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:51:56 -0500
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608301046430.7827@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Gilbert Sebenste's message of "Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:46:54 -0500 (CDT)")
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608301046430.7827@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, linux)

>>>>> "GS" == Gilbert Sebenste <sebenste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

GS> Someone filed a bug which tells of Sendmail 8.13.8 being released,
GS> which fixed a bug in 8.13.7.

The current security audit says:

CVE-2006-4434 ignore (sendmail, fixed 8.13.8) not exploitable

The CVE says:

Official Statement from Red Hat (8/30/2006)
This flaw causes a crash but does not result in a denial of service
against Sendmail and is therefore not a security issue.

http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-4434

 - J<

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sendmail bug to flaw: should I file another bug report?
  - From: Gilbert Sebenste

References:
- Sendmail bug to flaw: should I file another bug report?
  - From: Gilbert Sebenste

Prev by Date: removing ssh access in an emergency
Next by Date: Re: What is the language "British"?
Previous by thread: Sendmail bug to flaw: should I file another bug report?
Next by thread: Re: Sendmail bug to flaw: should I file another bug report?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]