-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
dpet wrote:
> I may have been misleading people. I'll start the story from the
> beginning.
>
> I acquired this Dell 9400, to replace my Toshiba (that didn't seem
> to like Fedora much) and installed kernel-2054 from DVD. Having got
> the ethernet set up, I did a yum update kernel and it installed
> kernel 2174-smp. Is this a correct thing for core duo systems?
Yep. I've used the smp kernels on this laptop with both FC4 and FC5.
> Well, to cut a long story short, I now find that kernel-2174
> responds correctly to the installation of ipw3945, but I still have
> this error and kernel panic with the smp version. Strange when an
> article covers this on a Samsung, using a slightly earlier
> kernel-smp, with no problem.
Odd indeed. I've not had any kernel panics using the driver with any
of the fedora kernels.
> Well, I will use the working version for now, but see if I can
> somehow sort out the smp in the future
Best of luck!
- --
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
======================================================================
If age imparted wisdom, there wouldn't be any old fools.
-- Claudia Young
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iQFDBAEBAgAtBQJE7ljuJhhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnBvYm94LmNvbS9+dG16L3BncC90
bXouYXNjAAoJEEMlk4u+rwzjYbUH/1UvATI3dxurEfEarlMsIIKChAnjWAR2K4Sg
nOqder4YxuXGPZggya65wrokAiKfBmp8pC2ec/QgMQFyPgcpsai2m0fvcrEUP8+m
ow7ELwdozV8b+dFLwfYs+YjRuYVTzTV9KJJ32bi3ecRt+tp4UPjRH3TNwwXP9Aq2
A2wJgEApL4Y+Z68PDGAwwpHuoxYl40ROc4FI48n1SIZ84E5Tdo/psfYTzRFziTf/
weHcQ6AM/26xzke6ETOIssoUPTu0rR7DPbJ1PjaO+1OGWE+wHoSHmZHD/vklRDwD
cGv8cCuwRIJ27LeSesE4Fftfpe9EdvJ9l7T5xDK2XcyWzw1bQ4U=
=eIzc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
