Re: [Fedora] Re: libslang.so.1?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Fedora] Re: libslang.so.1?
From: "Ashley M. Kirchner" <ashley@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 01:15:09 -0600
In-reply-to: <44B7382C.2080607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <44B730AC.1020704@xxxxxxxxxx> <44B7382C.2080607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060614)

Alexander Apprich wrote:

http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=libslang.so.1&submit=Search+...
And no, in this case forcing the rpm package to be install wouldn't
work, because at least one binary in this package depends on
libslang.so.1

So then the next question is, can I install an earlier version oflibslang (in this case v1) and have it not break stuff?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Fedora] Re: libslang.so.1?
  - From: Alexander Apprich

References:
- libslang.so.1?
  - From: Ashley M. Kirchner
- Re: libslang.so.1?
  - From: Alexander Apprich

Prev by Date: Re: how to sort mem process using ps command
Next by Date: Re: [Fedora] Re: libslang.so.1?
Previous by thread: Re: libslang.so.1?
Next by thread: Re: [Fedora] Re: libslang.so.1?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]