On 7/4/06, Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 23:02 +0200, Ambrogio wrote: > Il giorno lun, 03/07/2006 alle 07.09 -0500, Don Maxwell ha scritto: > > On 7/3/06, Ambrogio <fn050202@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Il giorno lun, 03/07/2006 alle 11.34 +0200, Henry Ritzlmayr ha scritto: > > > > Why don´t you use the RPMs provided by openoffice.org? > > > > RPMs for Fedora are ripped on certain functionality (IP isues). > > > > I am using the upstream RPMs for a while - and they work like a charm. > > > I don't understand. > > > I'm already using OpenOffice from openoffice.org (2.0.1 adn 2.0.2), but > > > everytime yum tell me that openoffice should be upgraded. > > > > > >
> You really have two choices here. 1. Continue as you are, using the upstream version of OOo, and live with the discrepancies between the upstream version you are using and the version in FC that you see and are having to work around. 2. Remove the upstream version and install the version from FC. Then yum will keep it updated and the complaints about needing updated that you currently see will disappear.
3. Ask upstream to make their packages compatible, explaining the problem. -- imalone
