On 03/07/06, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't think I believe the results though. For me it shows up to 50% loss at one point yet 0% for many things beyond it. That doesn't make a lot of sense because the more distant points have to traverse the hop where it claims losses are happening.
Yes, I was seeing that, too. Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com