On Saturday 01 July 2006 18:22, nigel henry wrote:
> On Saturday 01 July 2006 17:46, Jim Cornette wrote:
> > Bob Goodwin wrote:
> > > Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> > >> Bob Goodwin wrote:
> > >>>> Your experience is not unique. You can a) file a bug report ("a good
> > >>>> thing"), b) exclude nfs-utils and update the remaining packages, c)
> > >>>> wait a day or two and hope that it is a repository synchronization
> > >>>> problem or d) do nothing.
> > >>>
> > >>> No amount of "exclude=anything" seems to help?
> > >>>
> > >>> yum update --exclude=*nfs* --exclude=*xine*
> > >>>
> > >>> It looks to me like the only option is "do nothing" and wait?
> > >>>
> > >>> --> Running transaction check
> > >>> --> Processing Dependency: libgssapi.so.1 for package: nfs-utils
> > >>> --> Processing Dependency: libdirectfb-0.9.so.24 for package:
> > >>> xine-lib --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> > >>> Error: Missing Dependency: libdirectfb-0.9.so.24 is needed by package
> > >>> xine-lib
> > >>> Error: Missing Dependency: libgssapi.so.1 is needed by package
> > >>> nfs-utils
> > >>
> > >> I don't know about xine updates, however, for FC-core updates,
> > >> excluding both
> > >> nfs-utils-lib and libgssapi is needed.
> > >
> > > "Error: Missing Dependency: libdirectfb-0.9.so.24 is needed by package
> > > xine-lib
> > > Error: Missing Dependency: libgssapi.so.1 is needed by package
> > > nfs-utils "
> > >
> > > I did yum remove xine without success, finally had to yum remove
> > > xine-lib after which
> > > yum -y upgrade --exclude=nfs-utils* --exclude=libgssapi* allowed the
> > > update process to
> > > run to completion.
> > >
> > > Now to re-install xine ...
> > >
> > > Bob Goodwin
> > >
> > >> NOTE: This nfs-utils problems is known to FC-devel or FC6T1 users from
> > >> several weeks ago.
> > >> I don't know why this problem was not checked before releasing these
> > >> updates......
> > >>
> > >> See:
> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196359
> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197219
> > >> and
> > >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-June/msg00933.h
> > >>tm l
> >
> > There are many threads on the list currently with different subjects.
> > They all reference the same problem caused by the rc in the package name.
> >
> > The naming of the current rpm has an oddity in its name which makes it
> > appear newer than the package that is actually newer. Check the below
> > posting from the fedora-test-list. If you are running updates-testing,
> > the list has much value.
> >
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2006-June/msg00404.html
> >
> > This one case where the --nodeps option to rpm is used with good reason.
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > --
> > In specifications, Murphy's Law supersedes Ohm's.
>
> Hi Jim. I'm using Apt on FC5. I'm on dialup, and there are still some 2h
> 30m to go on the updates download, but apt-get dist-upgrade indicates that
> it's going to remove nfs-utils (1.0.8.rc2-5.FC5). The packages to be
> installed/removed etc are below.
>
> The following packages will be upgraded
> NetworkManager (0.6.2-2.fc5 => 0.6.3-1.fc5)
> NetworkManager-glib (0.6.2-2.fc5 => 0.6.3-1.fc5)
> NetworkManager-gnome (0.6.2-2.fc5 => 0.6.3-1.fc5)
> autofs (4.1.4-27 => 4.1.4-29)
> glx-utils (6.4.2-6 => 6.4.2-6.FC5.3)
> gnupg (1.4.3-2 => 1.4.4-2)
> httpd (2.2.0-5.1.2 => 2.2.2-1.0)
> k3b (0.12.14-0.FC5.2 => 0.12.15-0.FC5.1)
> lash (0.5.1-2.rhfc5.ccrma => 0.5.1-5.fc5)
> libX11 (1.0.0-3 => 1.0.0-3.FC5.0)
> libX11-devel (1.0.0-3 => 1.0.0-3.FC5.0)
> libgssapi (0.7-2.1 => 0.9-1.FC5)
> mesa-libGL (6.4.2-6 => 6.4.2-6.FC5.3)
> mesa-libGL-devel (6.4.2-6 => 6.4.2-6.FC5.3)
> mesa-libGLU (6.4.2-6 => 6.4.2-6.FC5.3)
> mesa-libGLU-devel (6.4.2-6 => 6.4.2-6.FC5.3)
> mesa-libGLw (6.4.2-6 => 6.4.2-6.FC5.3)
> mesa-libGLw-devel (6.4.2-6 => 6.4.2-6.FC5.3)
> mkbootdisk (1.5.2-5.2 => 1.5.2-7)
> mutt (1.4.2.1-6.2.1 => 1.4.2.1-6.3.fc5)
> nfs-utils-lib (1.0.8-3.1 => 1.0.8-4.FC5)
> python (2.4.3-4.FC5 => 2.4.3-8.FC5)
> python-devel (2.4.3-4.FC5 => 2.4.3-8.FC5)
> qt4 (4.1.4-1.fc5 => 4.1.4-4.fc5)
> qt4-devel (4.1.4-1.fc5 => 4.1.4-4.fc5)
> shared-mime-info (0.17-1.fc5.1 => 0.17-1.fc5.2)
> tetex (3.0-19.fc5 => 3.0-20.FC5)
> tetex-fonts (3.0-19.fc5 => 3.0-20.FC5)
> xorg-x11-apps (1.0.1-2 => 7.0-1)
> xorg-x11-server-Xorg (1.0.1-9.fc5.1.1 => 1.0.1-9.fc5.5)
> xorg-x11-server-debuginfo (1.0.1-9.fc5.1.1 => 1.0.1-9.fc5.5)
> xorg-x11-xdm (1.0.1-1.2 => 1.0.1-2)
> xorg-x11-xfs (1.0.1-4 => 1.0.1-4.FC5.0)
> xorg-x11-xinit (1.0.1-2 => 1.0.1-2.FC5.0)
> xorg-x11-xtrans-devel (1.0.0-3.2 => 1.0.0-3.2.FC5.0)
> The following packages will be REPLACED:
> qt4-config (1.0.8.rc2-5.FC5)
> (by (4.1.4-1.fc5)
> qt4) ()
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> nfs-utils (1.0.8.rc2-5.FC5)
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> qt4-x11 (4.1.4-4.fc5)
> 35 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 1 replaced, 1 removed and 0 not upgraded.
> Need to get 125MB of archives.
> After unpacking 103kB of additional disk space will be used.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n (which is now yes)
>
>
> Whether Apt has worked around this problem, I don't know yet. I'll update
> when the download finishes.
>
> Nigel.
Update:
Apt has just installed libgssapi, nfs-utils-lib with no dependency problems.
Admittadly, it has removed nfs-utils (1.0.8.rc2-5.FC5). I do not use NFS. It
was installed as part of the default install. There are some errors showing
perhaps to the removal of nfs-utils.
Shutting down NFS mountd: [FAILED]
Shutting down NFS daemon: [FAILED]
Shutting down NFS quotas : [FAILED]
Shutting down NFS services: [ OK ]
Shutting down RPC idmapd: [FAILED]
Stopping NFS statd: [ OK ]
The only nfs-utils package that synaptic shows as available is
1.0.8.rc2-5.FC5, which is the one that Apt has removed, and that various
posts have said is wrongly named.
Trying to use synaptic to reinstall nfs-utils (1.0.8.rc2-5.FC5) just brings up
dependency issues. (The following packages have unresolvable dependencies)
nfs-utils:
Predepends: librpcsecgss.so.1
Predepends: config(nfs-utils) (= 1.0.8.rc2-5.FC5)
Predepends: libgssapi.so.1
Hopefully the correct version of nfs-utils will turn up soon to correct the
situation.
Nigel.
