On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 20:30 -0700, jdow wrote:
> From: "Ed Greshko" <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > jdow wrote:
> >
> >> Ed, we're WAY past that stage if you've been reading.
> >
> > Oh, you're into discussing silly things now....
>
> I'm simply trying to figure out a scenario that would result
> in Aaron sending email to Todd's don't send here address without
> Todd replying to one of Aaron's emails and then Aaron replying
> to that email.
>
> The header markup taking place seems to require that complex a
> scenario. When Aaron gets back with us he can, perhaps, let us
> know if that's the scenario.
>
> (If not there may be something else peculiar going on.)
>
> In long form:
>
> Aaron sends a message to the list with his Reply-To:.
>
> That message acquires the FC list's dual Reply-To: feature.
>
> Todd replies to Aaron's email. It goes out to both Reply-To: addresses
> and the race is on.
>
> The direct email comes first without the FC4 Reply-To: header.
>
> The reflected email comes in a little later with the FC4 Reply-To:
> header.
>
> Aaron's mailer MAY delete the second reception as a duplicate message.
> Or it may be in his mailbox after the one that came direct.
>
> Either way Aaron replies to the direct message with no Reply-To: and
> gets rebuffed automatically.
>
> This leads to Aaron getting frustrated and angry.
>
> So that's the long form of what seems to be happening. If there is
> a shorter way I'd like to know. It might point out a misunderstanding
> of what's happening or a further and possibly pathological peculiarity
> in the lists modulo Todd's setup and Aaron's setup.
>
> {^_^}
I think the course of events is as documented above except for the
following human problem somewhat tied to how I use evolution. Mail to me
is put in a different mail box then mail from the list. Then the human
factor comes into play. I read mail to me before I read list mail.
So the first message I see is the one to me. If I reply to it then the
list is cut out of the mail chain,
Now I am not sure but I suspect that it is possible that the same
message from the list is elided as a duplicate. If so thinks get really
screwed up. Even if it appears things get screwed up depending on how
well my short term memory is working. Anyway all that is changed with
the removal of the original reply to header.
Except as I said above there is no way to get reply to sender to work
right. Reply to sender sends mail to the list as does reply and reply to
list. Now that seems to be a problem. Anyone know a solution?
By the way I appreciate people sticking with me through my mail crisis.
--
Aaron Konstam <akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
