Re: several discrepancies with new -2139 kernel.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/26/06, Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Greetings;

HP DV5320US lappy, with amd64 turion, but running 32 bit FC5.

Since 2139 has been out for about a week now, I thought I'd see how much
of the system would die if I booted to it, so I tried.

First, from /var/log/messages:

Jun 26 18:09:32 diablo kernel: Kernel command line: ro root=LABEL=/
irqpoll noapic noapci pci=assign-busses lapic
Jun 26 18:09:32 diablo kernel: Misrouted IRQ fixup and polling support
enabled
Jun 26 18:09:32 diablo kernel: This may significantly impact system
performance

Thats probably been there before, and yes, this box does seem to be slow
for a 1.8GHZ processor.  Can anyone comment?

That looks like a BIOS bug.  The BIOS routes the IRQs most of the
time. Have you verified that you're using the latest BIOS?

Then later:
Jun 26 18:09:34 diablo kernel: NET: Registered protocol family 16
Jun 26 18:09:34 diablo kernel: ACPI: bus type pci registered
Jun 26 18:09:34 diablo kernel: PCI: Using MMCONFIG
Jun 26 18:09:34 diablo kernel: PCI: No mmconfig possible on 0:18

No idea what 0:18 might represent in the hardware.  How do I define this?

Its the PCI bus ID of the device.  See lspci output.

Then a few lines later:

Jun 26 18:09:40 diablo kernel: bcm43xx driver
Jun 26 18:09:40 diablo kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKF] enabled
at IRQ 10
Jun 26 18:09:40 diablo kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:03:02.0[A] ->
Link [LNKF] -> GSI 10 (level, low) -> IRQ 10
Jun 26 18:09:40 diablo kernel: bcm43xx: Chip ID 0x4318, rev 0x2
Jun 26 18:09:40 diablo kernel: bcm43xx: Number of cores: 4
Jun 26 18:09:40 diablo kernel: bcm43xx: Core 0: ID 0x800, rev 0xd,
vendor 0x4243, enabled
Jun 26 18:09:40 diablo kernel: bcm43xx: Core 1: ID 0x812, rev 0x9,
vendor 0x4243, disabled
Jun 26 18:09:40 diablo kernel: bcm43xx: Core 2: ID 0x804, rev 0xc,
vendor 0x4243, enabled
Jun 26 18:09:40 diablo kernel: bcm43xx: Core 3: ID 0x80d, rev 0x7,
vendor 0x4243, enabled
Jun 26 18:09:40 diablo kernel: bcm43xx: PHY connected
Jun 26 18:09:40 diablo kernel: bcm43xx: Detected PHY: Version: 3, Type
2, Revision 7
Jun 26 18:09:40 diablo kernel: bcm43xx: Detected Radio: ID: 8205017f
(Manuf: 17f Ver: 2050 Rev: 8)
Jun 26 18:09:40 diablo kernel: bcm43xx: Radio turned off
Jun 26 18:09:40 diablo kernel: bcm43xx: Radio turned off

And quite a bit later:

Jun 26 18:09:41 diablo kernel: bcm43xx: set security called
Jun 26 18:09:41 diablo kernel: bcm43xx:    .level = 0
Jun 26 18:09:41 diablo kernel: bcm43xx:    .enabled = 0
Jun 26 18:09:41 diablo kernel: bcm43xx:    .encrypt = 0
Jun 26 18:09:41 diablo kernel: SoftMAC: Associate: Scanning for networks
first.
Jun 26 18:09:41 diablo kernel: SoftMAC: Associate: failed to initiate
scan. Is device up?
Jun 26 18:09:41 diablo kernel: bcm43xx: PHY connected
Jun 26 18:09:41 diablo kernel: bcm43xx: Error: Microcode
"bcm43xx_microcode5.fw" not available or load failed.

Now I've asked whats the procedure to switch from ndiswrapper to
actually using the bmc43xx.ko driver thats now part of the kernel tree,
and have been ignored.  Hell, even a link to rtfm would be fine.

So I had modified my /etc/modprobe.conf

options ndiswrapper if_name=wlan0
alias wlan0 ndiswrapper
alias eth1 tg3
#alias wlan0 bcm43xx

to
#options ndiswrapper if_name=wlan0
#alias wlan0 ndiswrapper
alias eth1 tg3
alias wlan0 bcm43xx

Which of course didn't work.

Perhaps it wants eth0 or wifi0 ?   What does "doesn't work" really
mean?  Did you get an error?


--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman                                    netllama@xxxxxxxxx
LlamaLand                       http://netllama.linux-sxs.org


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux