Re: Bad sector

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 16:25:09 -0400,
>   Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I had a bad sector and used the methods below, 2 days later the drive 
>> croaked!  RMA'd it today.  Bad sector? RMA it!
> 
> Bad sectors are expected on consumer drives and you are unlikely to be
> able to RMA a drive because of one bad sector. Modern drives are designed
> to be able to have some bad sectors.
> 
I must say that in my case smartd indicated 59 bad sectors. Does this
fall in the range of 'some'? ;)
I am still testing the drive with Maxtor PowerMax, but even the burn in
test does not show any problems, which seems strange to me? Could it be
that there is some kind of mistake in smartd?

Regards,
Jeroen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEmWb+1mK/wi107tkRAihWAKDRM8ClxJbtiZSi0GTSAQmZhdvACgCgui72
qvIYX1Ux5ViAJy4Hcvt053U=
=f9Z1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux