Re: Historical accuracy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Historical accuracy
From: "Chris Mohler" <cr33dog@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:17:36 -0500
In-reply-to: <1150677103.2374.166.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <BAYC1-PASMTP0933A9CF4F72E85AE26AE2AE830@xxxxxxx> <03b601c691be$ee1f24b0$0225a8c0@Wednesday> <1150521433.14925.25.camel@krs> <1150560117.12927.55.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1150565726.2374.58.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1150596226.13300.178.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1150612429.2374.96.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1150642035.26531.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44956928.4010107@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1150677103.2374.166.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

> Wow! Over a thousand years ago!
>
> You'd think they'd have all the bugs worked out by now.
----
took them a long time to get the kinks out of bugzilla

ENIAC thru FC6: under development for +/- 65 years
American Cockroach: stable for +/- 65 million years

Perspective is key... ;)

Chris

References:
- Re: FC4 or FC5
  - From: Sean
- Re: FC4 or FC5
  - From: jdow
- Re: FC4 or FC5
  - From: Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
- Re: FC4 or FC5
  - From: Les Mikesell
- Re: FC4 or FC5
  - From: Craig White
- Re: FC4 or FC5
  - From: Les Mikesell
- Re: FC4 or FC5
  - From: Craig White
- Historical accuracy (was: Re: FC4 or FC5)
  - From: Joe Klemmer
- Re: Historical accuracy
  - From: Bill Polhemus
- Re: Historical accuracy
  - From: Craig White

Prev by Date: RE: Enabling history keys
Next by Date: Re: yum cron job error
Previous by thread: Re: Historical accuracy
Next by thread: Re: Historical accuracy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]