On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 16:10, bruce wrote: > why do you suggest fc5? What is the intended use? FC5 is ahead in terms of application versions which is important for desktop apps. Server apps aren't changing that quickly unless you need a release version of dovecot or postgres 8.x. and you probably don't want the update churn on a server. > at the same time, what version of rhel is the latest? > > is there a way to get a the source srpms for rhel? or should one take a look > at centos? I'd look at Centos for a server, FC5 for a desktop and only drop back to FC4 if your particular hardware has problems with FC5. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
