Re: hosts.deny vs iptables

• To: Ed Kim <ed.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
• From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 13:34:48 -0500
• Cc: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• In-reply-to: <4474A588.3010006@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <20060524012813.3df1bcfe@FC5LAPTOP> <20060524054701.GA9097@xxxxxxxx> <023701c67ef6$d9b41470$0225a8c0@Wednesday> <447468E0.3040103@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20060524104639.552ac762@FC5LAPTOP> <20060524153423.GA31335@xxxxxxxx> <20060524115803.4db50a06@FC5LAPTOP> <4474A588.3010006@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 14:27:20 -0400,
  Ed Kim <ed.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> iptables -A FORWARD -m iprange --src-range 222.96.0.0-222.122.255.255 -j 
> DROP
> (syntax may not be correct, see man iptables)

That's nice. Is it approximately as effcient as using a mask?

• References:
  • hosts.deny vs iptables
    • From: CodeHeads
  • Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
    • From: Bruno Wolff III
  • Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
    • From: jdow
  • Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
    • From: Ed Kim
  • Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
    • From: CodeHeads
  • Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
    • From: Bruno Wolff III
  • Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
    • From: CodeHeads
  • Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
    • From: Ed Kim

• Prev by Date: Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
• Next by Date: Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
• Previous by thread: Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
• Next by thread: Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread