Re: hosts.deny vs iptables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Ed Kim <ed.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 13:34:48 -0500
Cc: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4474A588.3010006@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20060524012813.3df1bcfe@FC5LAPTOP> <20060524054701.GA9097@xxxxxxxx> <023701c67ef6$d9b41470$0225a8c0@Wednesday> <447468E0.3040103@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20060524104639.552ac762@FC5LAPTOP> <20060524153423.GA31335@xxxxxxxx> <20060524115803.4db50a06@FC5LAPTOP> <4474A588.3010006@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 14:27:20 -0400,
  Ed Kim <ed.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> iptables -A FORWARD -m iprange --src-range 222.96.0.0-222.122.255.255 -j 
> DROP
> (syntax may not be correct, see man iptables)

That's nice. Is it approximately as effcient as using a mask?

References:
- hosts.deny vs iptables
  - From: CodeHeads
- Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
  - From: Bruno Wolff III
- Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
  - From: jdow
- Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
  - From: Ed Kim
- Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
  - From: CodeHeads
- Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
  - From: Bruno Wolff III
- Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
  - From: CodeHeads
- Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
  - From: Ed Kim

Prev by Date: Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
Next by Date: Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
Previous by thread: Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
Next by thread: Re: hosts.deny vs iptables
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]