-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 24 May 2006 10:42:02 -0500 Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 22:54:34 -0700, > jdow <jdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > In other words, is there any reason you cannot use both? I use both. > > Complexity, performance. > Those aren't big hurdles, but for cases where tcpwrappers provides little > benefit, it may not be worth it. > I use this machine for the web only, so IPTables would be the best bet, right?? I most likely will use both though. Will -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEdJg2fw3TK8jhZrsRAmXJAJ0aaRbvIyghKWaJRLQDtQi3GG+2swCffQS9 bFKUySaRydEdwF5rYyaJjls= =XX+B -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
