On 5/12/06, Frank Pineau <frank@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 09:12 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > Right. But, as Rob pointed out, the OP is running the smp kernel. I > tend to do the grep thingy to remind myself of having the devel packages > loaded as well as other self built kernels. Well there's an odd thing. I tried rpm -q kernel on mine to see what happens (I've always done rpm -qa |grep kernel) and it returned my kernels just fine. Thing is, I'm running SMP x86_64 kernels, but it's only listed as SMP when I do a uname -a. Am I missing something?
The x86_64 kernel is now (as of FC5) SMP only. So one kernel covers both the SMP and non-SMP case. So there is no reason to have smp in the package name. Jonathan
