On Thursday 11 May 2006 15:48, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 21:16 -0400, Bill wrote: > > > > One of the issues though with doing this (grrr) is the Fedora > > > > Trademark. To do it - all the Fedora artwork legally has to be > > > > removed and replaced. > > > > > > Interesting - the equivalent to Centos but with fedora as the > > > base... > > > > > > However if all you really want to do is become the expert who > > > decides what 'everything' means for some set of people that > > > might care about your opinion, couldn't you do that by > > > publishing the output of some invocation of 'rpm -q' in > > > a format that could be used directly by anyone's yum to > > > load up the same packages? > > > > The bottom line is that the 'everything' selection was very useful. > > Where I work that is just what we do to all servers and > > workstations... install everything. Allows for less difficulties in > > choosing what to install and all machines end up with the same basic > > content except for the specialty items required due the the computer > > hardware. Now it takes longer to do an install. Of course that's > > assuming I could get FC5 to install... I am very disappointed and > > have given up. > > Ok, stop me if I ma wrong. install everthing exists. When you right > click on a group when doing an X install everything in the group is > installed. > So I have been told. I installed in text mode so I did not use that > method. Does that method work? > -- Well that's it you're wrong ;-) If you do a graphical install and right click on everything available, even optional packages you are still left with approx 800 packages not installed from the CD's Tony > Aaron Konstam <akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Tony Molloy. Dept. of Comp. Sci. University of Limerick
