Re: NFS vs SMB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 12:37 +0100, Dan Track wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Could someone please highlight the pros and cons of using nfs over smb.
> 
> Thanks in advance
> Dan
> 

I understand that samba is a little more secure than NFS.  But if you
really want an easy solution, try fuse-sshfs:

http://fedoraproject.org/extras/4/i386/repodata/repoview/fuse-
sshfs-0-1.2-3.fc4.html

It's implemented in user space and is as easy as a login.  Your UID's do
not need to be the same on other machines, like with NFS.  You just need
a login, and then you can mount the directory(s).  There's no messing
around with root controlled files as in NFS/Samba.  The implementation
is fast, easy, and I think it's more secure than either NFS or Samba.

LX
-- 
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
Individuals who make their abode in vitreous edifices
would be well advised to refrain from catapulting
projectiles.
Registered Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux