Re: fc5: install everything?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 8 May 2006, Mark Haney wrote:

[Flame ahead] It's quite obvious that if you like the 'install
everything' option that you've never really worried too much about disk
space or security for your servers.  Who /needs/ KDE and GNOME on a
server?  Matter of fact, who /needs/ everything on a desktop?  Sounds
extremely lazy and inefficient to me.

[I now step down from my soapbox and move on to other things.]

[Sarcasm]

It's quite obvious that if you _FILL IN RELIGIOUS ISSUE HERE_ you've _INSULT OTHER PERSON'S COMPETENCY_. Who /needs/ _FILL IN SPECIFIC THING I DON'T NEED MYSELF_. Matter of fact, who /needs/, _FILL IN GENERALITY I DON'T NEED MYSELF_. Sounds _INSULT OTHER PERSON'S WORK HABITS_.

[/Sarcasm]

--
Benjamin Franz

Unix was not designed to stop people from doing stupid things, because that would also stop them from doing clever things.
                                                       ---Doug Gwyn


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux