Re: A FC6 suggestion.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 11:25, Mauriat Miranda wrote:
> >
> > I would like to make the suggestion that the Default Label be more
> > descriptive. The author suggests something like FC%32ROOT.
> 
> I question if this necessary. You can have entries in fstab with or
> without labels. I've had 3 single Fedora installations on single drive
> across multiple partitions and never have run into a problem in the
> installer or usage nor have I had to manually edit fstab for this. I
> think in Anaconda the labels will start shifting to /1, /2, /home1
> etc. Since at runtime you don't deal with partition labels, just their
> mount points, it really is not a serious concern.

Assume you are in the IT dept for some group and you are used
to being able to re-use disks in different machines and to
recover data from any disk by installing/mounting in any working
machine.  Now you find that any combination of disks from
default fedora/RH/Centos installs won't boot...  It is a
problem.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux