Re: [PHILOSOPHY] Stability and Release Schedules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Guy Fraser wrote:
I am not completely familiar with Debian, but other OSes use a similar development/stable branch system. You may have misread or been mislead, because most similar systems still have releases for the reasons I stated above, but the only time the releases change is when a significant change is made, and not based on a time schedule. Periodically such systems also have patch releases that fix security or stability issues and require significant package updates.

Exactly. For example, Gentoo has a similar system, where deemed-stable packages have an 'arch' keyword, potentially broken but works-for-the-devs packages are keyworded as '~arch' and known-broken packages are hardmasked to prevent installation without explicit user interaction to "unmask" them as needed (where the 'arch' or '~arch' keywording is the architecture, such as '~x86', 'sparc', '~mips', 'amd64', et al).

--
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux