On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 15:52 -0700, John Wendel wrote: > Here's your chance to slap me up side of the head! > > Reading the Debian thread (and others) has made me wonder why Fedora > has to have "releases" at all. Why not have a continuously evolving > distribution? One would start by downloading an "installer system" > that would then use the existing mechanisms (yum, whatever) to update > itself. From this point on, why would one need "releases"? Just keep > releasing updates and new packages exactly as things are done now. > > I know there must be something wrong with this scenario; would someone > like to hit me with a clue stick. dialup users, for one. I personally would like to see a point release every couple of months or so that just has updates, and critical anaconda bugs fixes. I know some people home brew them.
