Re: Is wireless support any better with FC5?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 20:34 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 April 2006 17:46, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> ndiswrapper packages.
> >
> >There is one caveat.  You have to recompile the kernel to raise the
> >stack level from 4 to 16.  They recommend at least 16 stacks for
> >win32/ndiswrapper drivers.  There may be someone out there that's
> >already packaged the latest FC5 kernel with 16k stacks.
> 
> I did not have to do that to use the XP driver bcmwl5 with ndiswrapper 
> here.

What model card have you got, and what's the chipset?  I'm interested.
It would be nice to get a Super-G capable card that works with the
standard kernel.

I use mostly atheros chipset stuff and I've never been able to get a
kernel to work that was default with 4 stacks.  I either get a lockup or
the box reboots.  I have read that the stack requirements for the win32
drivers naturally vary from product to product.

TIA!

LX
-- 
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
It is fruitless to become lachrymose over
 precipitately departed lacteal fluid.
Registered Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux