On 4/23/06, Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sunday 23 April 2006 17:17, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > >On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Gene Heskett wrote: > >> On Sunday 23 April 2006 13:36, Lauri wrote: > >>> # chcon -t texrel_shlib_t > >>> /usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Reader/intellinux/lib/*.so > >>> > >>> Lauri > >> > >> Thank you very much Lauri, that worked like a champ. But why does > >> it seem to be such a huge secret other than its ulitmately being > >> usefull to the blackhats? > >> > >> I assume that this command line (the top line above) can be used > >> against any other known good (we think) but similarly malfunctioning > >> (the bottom line above) program? > > > >Yes, if you are sure that's the malfunction. The binary NVIDIA > > driver's GLX and VMWare Workstation are the other examples I know of. > > Are there others? > > > That question is rhetorical I assume as we won't know till it bites us > again if there are any others. But it does tend to show just how much > committment Adobe has in supporting linux. Their test box is probably > still running rh6.1... > > >-- > > Matthew Saltzman > > > >Clemson University Math Sciences > >mjs AT clemson DOT edu > >http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs > > -- > Cheers, Gene > People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word > 'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's > stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-) > Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above > message by Gene Heskett are: > Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. > Gene, how is Adobe responsible for a problem caused by Red Hat / Fedora Core developers? You are using essentially the same version of Acrobat Reader that worked without problems for Fedora Core 4. It is not Adobe's fault that the Red Hat / Fedora Core implementers of SELinux changed the rules after Acrobat Reader 7 was released. If you have a bone to pick, take it up with the responsible party.
