Re: Is wireless support any better with FC5?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Please don't top-post, it destroys readability...

Lonni J Friedman wrote:
> On 4/19/06, James Pifer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Is wireless support any better with FC5?
> [snip by craig]
> For me FC5 has been an absolute nightmare for wifi.  Everything worked
> perfectly for me with a orinico supported pcmcia wifi card in FC4.
> Since upgrading, I can't get it to work at all.  The card is detected,
> yet it never can connect to anything on any network.

I've been on FC5 for a while on a Tosh Tecra M2. The on-board Intel
PRO2100b is working great, as is the Linksys WPC54GSv2 PCMCIA card
(using ndiswrapper). If anything, the PCMCIA support seems to be
light-years ahead of where is was last time I was unfortunate enough to
need it :-)

Craig.

- --
Craig McLean		http://fukka.co.uk
[email protected]	Where the fun never starts
	Powered by FreeBSD, and GIN!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFERmYqMDDagS2VwJ4RAnzOAKCEcTzbgcEI+O5bl1OOFx3SqacKnwCbBz9r
UfjIh/cAlZV9B3hQUUL/0+E=
=izdn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux