On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:56:00PM -0400, William Case wrote: > This is the core question. Which distro is the prettiest. I am not Apple OS X. Linux doesn't even come close. The largest deficit is fonts -- nothing even approaching ClearType here. And hardware acceleration like Aqua, though that might be slowly coming (I can't try it, since it's not yet in x86_64). > being trivial or sarcastic. People do judge a book by its cover. Even Me neither. I run Sarge on the servers, FC5 x86_64 on the AMD64 64 desktop (haven't booted into XP in a while, and if dvdshrink runs on WINE as purported unlikely I will -- for everything else there is VMWare) and OS X (iBook G4). (After Amstrad CPC-464 my second computer I owned was the Amiga 2000 and then a Linux PC, so my excursions into proprietary land (Redmond and Cupertino) are reasonably recent). > while they are trying to show themselves as hard bitten, > give-me-the-performance, professionals. > > I would love to see some real artists added to the development teams of > distributions, desktops and applications. That would blow Microsoft and > even Apple right out of the water. The reason Apple looks that way is because they hire top talent in design and usability. Such talent is scarce, so no wonder FLOSS looks rough around the edges. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
