On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 07:46:50PM -0500, Bill Polhemus wrote: > Gilboa Davara wrote: > >P.S. Please don't post in HTML. Thanks. > > > OFF TOPIC: > > FWIW, I think that in this day and age, complaining about posting in > HTML is patently ridiculous. Posting HTML-only is patently ridiculous. Multipart is okay. > Either set up your list to strip out the HTML--a common technology It is not my list, unfortunately. > that's been around for years now--or just live with it. Don't post to the list in HTML-only, and just live with it. > Very, very few people use Pine or Mutt to post to email lists any more. What has this to do with posting in HTML-only mail? > And I'm not just talking about those who use Outlook Express. I happen > to use Thunderbird, for example. Good for you. Set it to post in multipart, and all is good. > I happen to also LIKE HTML email. It is quite easy on the eyes, > particularly for someone like me whose eyesite isn't what it used to be. You seem to be using the wrong fonts, then. > This used to be a common complain W-A-Y 'long time ago, when most of the > Internet world was still text-based. To me, the complaint is spurious at > the present time. You're not understanding the problem set of HTML-only. I suggest a web search. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
