Thomas Allen wrote:
I just want to get the tape drive working to do simple backups.....I am
a newbie at this linux so please bear with me....are the apps.hard to
configure? or should I stick with tar? Thanks for the help!
Well, I was all set to give you some help, until I saw your
netcop tendencies below...
I think I'll just keep my mouth shut.
Mike
Thomas Allen
Northampton Community College
LAN Support Specialist
TAllen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(610) 861-5522
fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx 03/28/06 5:53 PM >>>
Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: OFF LIST: Re: fc5: install everything? (Mike McCarty)
2. Re: Destination host unreachable (Neil Cherry)
3. Re: OFF LIST: Re: fc5: install everything? (Craig White)
4. Re: Gmail Thunderbird Configuration (Neil Cherry)
5. Re: why is FC5 still compiled at -O2 (Jack Howarth)
6. Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 25, Issue 348 (Thomas Allen)
7. Re: Oh....rats.... screensaver activates itself (Jim Cornette)
8. Re: The pet supermarket relay? (Craig White)
9. Fedora C4 dies (Jim Douglas)
10. [OT] Re: FC5 nforce4 sata initrd problems [for geeks??]
(Wieslaw Kierbedz)
11. Re: My Epson scanner now works - without USB 2 (David Fletcher)
12. Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 25, Issue 348 (Craig White)
13. Re: Fedora C4 dies (Jaysen B. Johnson)
14. Re: system startup + cryptsetup (Marc Schwartz)
15. Re: floaty around pointer in firefox (William Yardley)
16. yum: /usr/lib/libmp3lame.so.0 is not a symbolic link (Nat Gross)
17. Re: yum: /usr/lib/libmp3lame.so.0 is not a symbolic link
(Nat Gross)
18. Re: Fedora C4 dies (alan)
19. Boot Loader Recovery (M.K)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:51:19 -0600
From: Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: OFF LIST: Re: fc5: install everything?
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <4429AFD7.5020403@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Mike McCarty wrote:
Craig White wrote:
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 15:47 -0500, Claude Jones wrote:
On Tue March 28 2006 15:29, Jim Cornette wrote:
The everything install is not really missing. The choice is a
few clicks away vs. one button to pull in all packages
available in core.
After kicking up a big fuss over this, I now pretty much agree with
you. Any time lost by having to click through several extra menus is
offset by the time saved by not having to deal with the issues that
were created by the old "everything" button, after the installation.
----
gee...you got pretty po'd at me about this topic too.
;-)
I give you credit for changing your mind.
Craig
That was such a polite nice reply, I have to comment.
Well done, Craig.
BTW, how are things over on CentOS?
Mike
Oh,well, even ON the list! :-)
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
