On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 11:13 -0800, Dan Thurman wrote: > On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 14:12 +0930, Tim wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 12:13 -0800, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: > > > Sorry for the false alarm... I had a bad download > > > as Craig White suggested. I doubled checked the > > > sha1sum and turns out I had a bad disc #4 download. > > > > Begs the question: How did it pass the media checks then? > > > > The download of disc #4 failed sah1sum but passed the media checks! ---- the best logical reason for this would be that it was one of the other discs' in the set with a wrong name - the sha1sum of the disc that failed would likely have been the same one of the other images. Craig
