On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 17:59, John Summerfield wrote: > I'm sure someone administering 1300 users understands those things. > Still, you don't want those nasty surprises when the software breaks. > You want software that "just works" all the time, and Fedora Core doesn't, I'm not sure that's entirely fair. While I agree that there are better choices than fedora for enterprise level servers, remember that he is talking about switching away from windows where downtime from 'zero-day' viruses is common and should be expected in spite of third party add-ons - I've been through 2 myself in the last few years. Fedora does have some problems but they are almost entirely when you drop an untested update onto specific hardware. It's almost unheard of for a working system to fail mysteriously if you don't change it so I'd expect a system where all updates are tested on identically hardware before rolling out to be at least as solid as anything under windows. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
