Am Do, den 23.03.2006 schrieb Danny Ciarniello um 17:24: > Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > >Am Mi, den 22.03.2006 schrieb Kahn Seidl um 19:58: > >>Is it still the same process for reiserfs and linux? > >> > >>to just boot linux reiserfs? > >> > >> > > > >Yes. > > > > > No. At least, I had no end of problems doing this. Use linux selinux=0 > reiserfs instead. Also, you may need to boot to rescue and modify > /boot/grub/grub.conf and /etc/fstab after the initial installation. See > http://fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=99462 for all the gory > details. > > Mind you, there may be partition schemes where the problems that I > encountered won't happen. > > Dan. > > >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AnacondaOptions > > 6. MYTH - Fedora should use an alternative default filesystem Sorry, that was a wrong URL pasted. Correct one is: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraMyths 6. MYTH As reiserfs still isn't officially supported as a filesystem during install problems like with SELinux may occur. This is what the Wiki says. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp Serendipity 22:07:15 up 9 days, 23:55, load average: 0.25, 0.17, 0.18
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
