On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 16:39 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote: > On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 16:53 -0300, Mariano López Reta wrote: > > > > I just wanted to know if I can have both installed so yum can search > > both. > > I know for a fact that Livna is compatible with Extras/Updates/Fedora. > All other repos - I just download/install packages manually. > Something is implicitly wrong with your statement of fact above. Livna claims to be compatible with Extras. Rpmforge claims to be compatible with Extras It is a known fact that Livna and Rpmforge are not compatible. Ergo one of the first two statements appears false. I have used Rpmforge constantly and never encountered a conflict with the Fedora Updates_released, Base, or Extras repos. I wonder where explicitly the fallacy in the claims lies. > No, I lied - I do configure ATrpms in yum, but I disable it in the .repo > file and, when I am using it, I add --enablerepo=atrpms to the yum > parameters. I only install MythTV from ATrpms anyway, and nothing else. > Like you I also pick/choose which packages to use from where. I use ATrpms and Livna selectively. > -- > Florin Andrei > > http://florin.myip.org/ >
