On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 23:45 -0600, Patrick Barnes wrote: > Victory at all costs? People have taken that approach before. We have to > weigh the costs, benefits, and risks. Without a great deal of hassle to our > subscribers, we cannot correct this issue in a reliable manner. and: > I'm afraid the best thing we can do is set up very harsh rules against UOL. > This includes rejecting them at mail servers, banning them from everything we > can, and seeing them listed in as many blacklists as possible. Those two paragraphs would seem to be in stark contrast. Cheers Steffen.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
