On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 12:48 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote: > Craig White wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 01:48 -0700, RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN wrote: > > > >>Thanks again mostly u/we got it to work so far. However it is asking for a pile of dependancies. I know give a guy an inch and he will try to take a mile or km here in Canada. Is there a way to install without any gui stuff or mabey i am wrong mabey there is no gui stuff. Some of the dependancies for those dependancies are X11 related. > >> > >>I do not have any X11 stuff on this box it has no xwindows/gnome system and is minimum install Command prompt only. So before i go ahead and make a big mess of my faily clean fedora box do i really need all these or is there a way to turn some of them off. > >> > >>Thanks again and sorry about top post i think my clock was messed up not sure how it happend but should be fixed now. > > > > ---- > > perhaps then bacula isn't the right package for your needs as some of > > the tools are GUI. > > > > Perhaps you want to use something like amanda which is already in the > > packaging, fully cli and very effective. > > I use bacula at home without the GUI; gconsole isn't much more than a > terminal emulator sat on top of bconsole anyway, isn't it? ---- yeah - I played with it - it just doesn't seem worth it to install X and a bunch of packages if that is necessary to get it installed. On the one system that I built, I already had X and so that didn't represent a block for me. I do like amanda though. Craig
