Re: dhcpd.conf question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bob Hartung:
>>> ddns-update-style      interim;
 
Tim:
>> You have that (above), but don't have a corresponding zone file for it
>> to update.

John Summerfied:
> Unimportant. Mine doesn't either.

If one's not doing DDNS updates (updating a DNS server with DHCP
configured records), which sounds like it, then it's probably better to
directly specify so, than have a half-configured server.

i.e. ddns-update-style none;

> However, this line can be important: 
> authoritative;

Hmm, I'd have thought that'd only be needed if you had more than one
DHCP server on a network (a bad idea unless they're deliberated
configured to be co-operative), or if you used a PC on different
networks, but it may well be required.

Taken from the dhcpd.conf man file:

"Network administrators setting up authoritative DHCP servers for
their networks should always write authoritative; at the top of
their configuration file to indicate that the DHCP server should
send DHCPNAK messages to misconfigured clients.  If this is not
done, clients will be unable to get a correct IP address after
changing subnets until their old lease has expired, which could take
quite a long time."

-- 
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux