Re: dhcpd.conf question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Craig White wrote:
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 17:26 -0600, Bob Hartung wrote:
Hi all,
I'm beginning to think that some of the dhcpd docs are wrong or perhaps I can't read. I am trying to write a simple dhcpd.conf file for a machine with a single NIC. This will assign a small subset of the 192.168.14.0 subnet for automatic assignment and will assign a fixed ip address to a small NAS appliance that I purchased.

The code (below) fails on /etc/dhcpd start.  What did I miss?

#
ddns-update-style      interim;
ignore client-updates;

#subnet 192.168.14.0 netmask 255.255.255.0{

#default-lease-time     600;
#max-lease-time       86400;

#option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
#option domain-name-servers  204.127.203.135, 204.148.225.135;
#option routers     192.168.14.249;
#}

subnet 192.168.14.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
    range 192.168.14.80 192.168.14.95;
    default-lease-time	600;
    max-lease-time     86400;

    option domain-name-servers  xxx.yyy.zzz.rrr, xxx.ddd.ttt.ooo;
    option routers   192.168.14.249;

    host simpleshare {
	hardware ethernet 00:01:6c:bd:1d:90;
         fixed-address     192.168.14.96;
         option host-name  simpleshare;
    }
}
----
from a brief look at it...a closing brace at the end...easier to notice
these things if you follow an indentation structure more closely.

Craig

Where is the mis-match, exactly? I count 3 opens and 3 closes. 3 sets. 1 set is commented out and the other two are properly nested in the remainder. Am I missing something?

--R
------------------------------------------------------------------------
/I got Freedom,...I got freedom in my code (FC3/FC4)/
Registered Unix <http://counter.li.org> user #409453


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux