Re: Wget, Yum and network investigation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2006/2/27, antonio montagnani <antonio.montagnani@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 2006/2/24, Tod Merley <todbot88@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:14:08 +0100
> > > From: "antonio montagnani" < antonio.montagnani@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: Re: Wget, Yum and network investigation
> > > To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Message-ID: <
> > 4c37b6af0602240814w23de72fdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> > >
> > > > > > nameserver 62.211.69.150
> > > > > > nameserver 212.48.4.15
> > >
> > > > > > Skype : antoniomontag
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi again Antonio!
> > > > >
> > > > > I just have a bit of a thought here.  You may have simply a problem
> > with
> > > > the
> > > > > URL names requested by yum.  Is it possible that somehow the
> > repositories
> > > > > have been re-named (their URLs) and that was not completed in the
> > update
> > > > > process.  If I try to nslookup or whois the long repo URLs you sent in
> > > > your
> > > > > first message they fail.
> > > Are the addresses differant (the requested URL's
> > > > > yum is attempting to access) on the two machines?
> > >
> > > No, I don't think so, also because yum and yumex worked for a long
> > > time. and my system used the same configuration file: furthermore, I
> > > get the probel on each repository....
> > >
> > > If I point firefox at
> > > > the
> > > > > addresses it finds them - perhaps the "redirection" switch in a yum
> > config
> > > > > file is set differently.  Just bits of thoughts.
> > > > >
> > > > > I must say I am curious what kind of Internet access you have over
> > there?
> > > > > How do you get Internet to the machines?
> > >
> > > My network are connected to Internet through tthe router, that are
> > > connected to a modem (exactly same modem on both network.....). Both
> > > network work fine apart from yum, yumex and wget that is not working
> > > on the office network
> > > > >
> > > > > Ethereal gets down to the nitty gritty and would probably be a good
> > one to
> > > > > do here.  Of course it takes time.
> > > > >
> > > > > Good Hunting!
> > > > >
> > >
> > > Hunting is over untill monday morning!!!!
> > >
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > Tod
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > fedora-list mailing list
> > > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > > To unsubscribe:
> > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Antonio Montagnani
> > > Skype : antoniomontag
> >
> >
> > Hi again Antonio!
> >
> > You are probably at the point where tcpdump/Ethereal are the tool to unravel
> > the mystery,
> >
> > Have a good weekend my friend!
> >
> > Tod
> >
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe:
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> >
> >
>
> I have used ethereal with wget and wget --inet4.
> May I attach the results in two separate files, so some expert can help me???
> --
> Antonio Montagnani
> Skype : antoniomontag
>

After this post, I have a doubt:
as I get very different results, shall I dump result from ethereal
relative to eth1 interface (NIC connected to modem) or to ppp0 (ADSL
modem)???
--
Antonio Montagnani
Skype : antoniomontag


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux