Re: [OT] The GPL and possible violations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael A. Peters wrote:

> Actually it's not - it is the GPL that governs the distribution rights
> to the software (in this case the kernel), not the unwritten intent of
> the developers.

nVidia binary seems to exist on the basis of "unwritten intent of the
developers".

Another guy worth talking to is Harald Welte:

http://gpl-violations.org/

In the Tom Tom case

http://gpl-violations.org/news/20041024-linux-tomtom.html

It seems that a central element was "The source code for the Linux
Operating System Kernel, including TomTom's own modifications, is now
made available at http://www.tomtom.com/gpl.";

-Andy

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux