Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 02:50:38AM -0500, Paul Michael Reilly wrote: > > So one of my systems has the service and another does not. Hmmmmm. I > > drill into the issue further and it would appear that ATrpms provided > > yum for the non-yum service system. Grrrrrrrr. Fedora's own dll > > hell. And now it would appear that a total re-install would be > > required to undo the dependence that particular system has on the > > ATrpms packages. > > Disable ATrpms and reinstall the original yum. I tried to reinstall the original yum but did not disable ATrpms first. That led to all kinds of complaints about other AT dependencies. I will try disabling your repo but I will be pleasantly surprised if that undoes the previous AT installs. > > Live and learn. Whatever it was that convinced me to enable the > > ATrpms repo is long since forgotten, but I will never use the site > > again, but to meet an isolated and well defined need that cannot be > > met from a less intrusive packager. > > 12:00 at the central station. No guns, only melee fight. So you must be the "AT" in ATrpms. I'm curious why your version of yum is so different than the original. Does your repo have another solution for an automated update? Would that be noon, or midnight? :-) -pmr
