Re: Automatic update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeremy Thompson wrote:
On 2/12/06, John Summerfied <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Jeremy Thompson wrote:


<newb>

I thought the NTFS drivers were included in the kernel now.  Why would

you

roll your own?

</newb>

Not in FC3: the source is there, not the binaries. Try this on your
system:
modinfo ntfs




K Thanks.  I am running FC4 though!  Why still run 3?

a1. Why update to FC4 when FC5 is almost here?
a2. Isn't the rate of updates on FC4 a little high for stability?
a3. What new features do I need? Where I have it installed, it works.

One system I maintain is still running RHL 7.3. It has been working for years, it gets updates from Fedora Legacy, I get to laugh at those who try to crack it. Upgrading involves migrating the mail services (the software in use does not appear in any likely replacement), downtime and the likelihood I'll get it wrong. We like the alternative - it keeps working until the hardware dies. Then we do something. We know it will be inconvenient at that time, but we also think that time is years away yet.





--

Cheers
John

-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/

do not reply off-list


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux