Tim wrote: > On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 18:09 +1100, Norman Gaywood wrote: > >>Is hacking on the /etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules the >>"right way" to do these things? > > > If you read through the guides, and I can't remember which one at the > moment, they tell you to leave it along and make your own script with a > different number, one picked so that it takes preference. > > e.g. /etc/udev/rules.d/10-local.rules > > >>What happens when the rules get updated. > > > Good question. > Only the 50-udev.rules gets updated. The 10-local.rules does not get touched. Because it comes before the 50-udev.rules, it gets processed first. Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
