-----Original Message----- From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 8:56 PM To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 24, Issue 22 Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx You can reach the person managing the list at fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: hylafax changing destination (Alexander Dalloz) 2. Re: Slightly OT: Photoshop tops 'most wanted' Linux app list (Rickey Moore) 3. OOo PDF export bloat: including fonts in PDFs (Charles Curley) 4. Re: Generic Install (tsimi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) 5. Re: Generic Install (tsimi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) 6. Re: Solution on using serial port mouse in Fedora Core 4 (Jeff Vian) 7. Re: cannot rewrite password file (Jeff Vian) 8. Re: networking initskripts (Jeff Vian) 9. Re: A question about procmailrc (jdow) 10. Re: A question about procmailrc (jdow) 11. Re: A question about procmailrc (jdow) 12. Re: process memory limitations (Nifty Hat Mitch) 13. RAID 5 with different size disks (Fajar Priyanto) 14. Re: ML-37 clock speed (Nifty Hat Mitch) 15. Re: CD/CDR Operation (Peter Gordon) 16. Re: RAID 5 with different size disks (Gordon Messmer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 01:30:39 +0100 From: Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: hylafax changing destination To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1138926639.14824.364.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Am Do, den 02.02.2006 schrieb azeem ahmad um 21:03: > is it possible to configure hylafax in such a way that it work as mail-fax > gateway with dynamic destination numbers. > like currently i m running hylafax in a fashion that every mail sent to > faxmail@xxxxxxxx is handed over to hylafax that sends it to fone number > 5545412, now what i want is to facsilitate user that he could specify a > number as well in his mail > Azeem http://www.ahinc.com/hylafax.html Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp Serendipity 01:30:18 up 60 days, 6:07, load average: 0.29, 0.17, 0.16 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060203/5892e085/at tachment.bin ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:32:20 -0800 (PST) From: Rickey Moore <wayward4now@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Photoshop tops 'most wanted' Linux app list To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <20060203003220.33495.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 --- Brian Mury <brianmury@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 11:29 -0500, taharka wrote: > > I'm disappointed to see Adobe Photoshop riding at #1. Not needed > when > > you have the gimp. > > ...except that gimp can't do some of the stuff that photoshop can > do, > and some of that functionality is required by some of us. As a > photographer I use gimp and photoshop for postprocessing images. I > wish > I could use gimp exclusively, but it just doesn't fill all my needs > at the moment. I could stand some eduaction if you have a moment. What does gimp lack? I can't make heads nor tails of one tenth of it, and it's menu is sorta obscure, but in my own ignarance I am impressed that it seems to have so much. It would be good to learn which functionality it needs / doesn't have. Thanks, in advance, Ric ================================================ My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say: "There are two Great Sins in the world... ...the Sin of Ignorance, and ...the Sin of Stupidity. Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad. Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/ ================================================ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:33:16 -0700 From: Charles Curley <charlescurley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: OOo PDF export bloat: including fonts in PDFs To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <20060203003316.GB11926@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Every month I write and export a certain document as PDF so I can send it to the client. It has been in the 3KB range. All of a sudden it has gone to 432 KB. The difference is that I have gone to a fresh hard drive with a fresh installation of FC4 and OOo 2.0. The previous installation is FC4 and OOo 1.4 upgraded to 2.0. The large files include fonts, the small ones do not. As far as I can tell, the document does not use the included font. How can I find out which fonts are included and which are not? Thanks -- Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060202/2521de51/at tachment.bin ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:37:05 +0000 From: tsimi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Generic Install To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <W267306847145251138927025@webmail2> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Really, my CPU is an Intel Pentium 4 D. It's a newer Dual Core Pentium 3.0Ghz processor. I'm running Fedora FC4 x86_64 and FC5t2 x86_64. My friend has an older Pentium ( II I think ). I'd like to load a hard disk for him with Fedora 32bit so all he has to do is replace his hard drive. I just need to know if a fresh install from my machine onto a hard drive ( that I install on my machine for the install ) will likely run when he installs it into his. His machine has a pretty plain vanilla IDE interface, as does this drive. Thanks Todd > -----Original Message----- > From: Anne Wilson [mailto:cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2006 05:27 PM > To: 'For users of Fedora Core releases' > Subject: Re: Generic Install > > On Thursday 02 Feb 2006 16:45, tsimi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > My mistake, > > > > I have a Pentium 4 D > > > > Thanks > > Todd > > > > > On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 21:52 +0000, tsimi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > >>Hi, > > >> > > >>I have a friend that is using a box I setup for him several years > > >> ago with RedHat 7.2. I think he would really like FC and would > > >> like to send him a hard drive with already installed, as he is not > > >> an OS/Hardware guy. > > >> > > >>Is it possible for me to install an IDE drive in my machine ( > > >> Pentium 486 D ) > > > > > > Didn't Intel call the "586" processor family "Pentium" because they > > > couldn't trademark numbers? > > > > That's my understanding. But AMD produced a processor called > > the 586, which is a 486 class processor. > > > As a long-time AMD user, I can only say that I do not remember such a > processor, and I don't think it existed. Their names were always very > different from Intel ones. > > > > (my point being how can a "Pentium" also be "486"?) > > > > AIUI, it cannot. > > Anne > -- > Registered Linux User No.293302 (http://counter.li.org/) > ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:39:11 +0000 From: tsimi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Generic Install To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <W267306847278471138927151@webmail2> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Really, my CPU is an Intel Pentium 4 D. It's a newer Dual Core Pentium 3.0Ghz processor. I'm running Fedora FC4 x86_64 and FC5t2 x86_64. My friend has an older Pentium ( II I think ). I'd like to load a hard disk for him with Fedora 32bit so all he has to do is replace his hard drive. I just need to know if a fresh install from my machine onto a hard drive ( that I install on my machine for the install ) will likely run when he installs it into his. His machine has a pretty plain vanilla IDE interface, as does this drive. Thanks Todd > -----Original Message----- > From: Anne Wilson [mailto:cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2006 05:27 PM > To: 'For users of Fedora Core releases' > Subject: Re: Generic Install > > On Thursday 02 Feb 2006 16:45, tsimi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > My mistake, > > > > I have a Pentium 4 D > > > > Thanks > > Todd > > > > > On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 21:52 +0000, tsimi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > >>Hi, > > >> > > >>I have a friend that is using a box I setup for him several years > > >> ago with RedHat 7.2. I think he would really like FC and would > > >> like to send him a hard drive with already installed, as he is not > > >> an OS/Hardware guy. > > >> > > >>Is it possible for me to install an IDE drive in my machine ( > > >> Pentium 486 D ) > > > > > > Didn't Intel call the "586" processor family "Pentium" because they > > > couldn't trademark numbers? > > > > That's my understanding. But AMD produced a processor called > > the 586, which is a 486 class processor. > > > As a long-time AMD user, I can only say that I do not remember such a > processor, and I don't think it existed. Their names were always very > different from Intel ones. > > > > (my point being how can a "Pentium" also be "486"?) > > > > AIUI, it cannot. > > Anne > -- > Registered Linux User No.293302 (http://counter.li.org/) > ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:53:40 -0600 From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Solution on using serial port mouse in Fedora Core 4 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1138928020.17884.97.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 11:38 +0800, Wong Kwok-hon wrote: > Hello all, > > I found that the Fedora Core 4 is only can use USB mouse and failed to > reconfigure to use serial mouse such as using COM1-4. I found from the > other board and tested it is work as follows:- > > Quote started > ==================== > Here is what I do to fix for FC4 (both x86-32 and x86-64) for serial mice: > > 1. Log into console or text mode as root. > 2. Run mouseconfig - set up for serial mouse, ignore any error messages. > 3. Use your favourite editor to open /etc/sysconfig/mouse > 4. The last line should contain /dev/mice - change this to /dev/ttyS? > where the question mark refers to the port your mouse is plugged > into. > 5. Save /etc/sysconfig/mouse > 6. Run service gpm start and when you go back to X (Gnome / KDE) the > mouse should work. > ================= > Quote ended > > #Note the gpm cannot restart after mouseconfig done and just work > after reboot as I tried. > > And I wonder why the author didn't fix the problem permanently so need > to fix it manually. > A very good reason that I can think of is that he chose to not waste effort doing something that is almost never needed. I personally have not even seen a serial mouse for at least 5 years. USB and ps2 are the commonly used types today and since a serial mouse is an endangered species, why spend extra effort. Your instructions above are helpful to those who may need them. > Hope that can help other people. > > Wong Kwok Hon > ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:57:07 -0600 From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: cannot rewrite password file To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1138928228.17884.101.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 02:00 -0800, krishnamurthy kandi wrote: > Hi, > I logged into my linux box as user,now i want create new user by > excuting the command /usr/sbin/useradd kimo then it is saying that > useradd: cannot rewrite password file > > what should i do create new user from existing user. You must have root privileges or be using sudo to add new users. You also can add users using the menu option (in gnome) Desktop -> System Settings -> Users and Groups > > thanks > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & more > on new and used cars. > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 19:06:29 -0600 From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: networking initskripts To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1138928789.17884.108.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 12:21 +0100, Boris Glawe wrote: > Hello, > > The configuration for networkinterfaces is kept in > /etc/sysconfig/networking/. > > in profiles/default/ and in devices/ there are two identical files for > each device. > > Why is the configuration for a networkinterface stored twice? > It is actually only stored once. It has 3 hard links to each file, the two you name above and in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts as well. This latter one is the original location. Changing the contents in any one changes all. I do not know exactly why they chose to create the additional links but I suspect it was influenced by the ability to create profiles for networking. > Here's what I am going to do: > I'd like to manually add configuration files to many clients. Each > client needs an additional interface, though it has only one physical > interface. Thus I'd like to add "eth0:1" as a virtual interface. > > Is it correct to only copy a file containing the approriate > configuration called "ifcfg-eth0:1" to > /etc/sysconfig/networking/devices? Or do I also have to copy the file to > /etc/sysconfig/networking/profiles/default/? > > thanks in advance! > > greets Boris > ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:56:00 -0800 From: "jdow" <jdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: A question about procmailrc To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <0d9f01c62864$fc518780$1225a8c0@kittycat> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original From: "Hongwei Li" <hongwei@xxxxxxxxx> >> If I'm reading this correctly you want a subject that matches on" >> "is out of the office*" >> >> You're using the dots to accept any single character as a word >> separator, but whats the * at the end doing for you? >> >> Don >> > > The * is a wild char because there are probably other letters after office, > e.g. . ] or space etc. I also tried: "*" is not the wild card. 1) It is not needed at the end of the line. 2) The wild card is ".*" > :0: > * ^Subject:.*is out of the office* > $MAILDIR/Trash > > The situation remains the same -- not working. Is $MAILDIR defined for your procmail invocation? I tend to use "$HOME/mail/<foldername>" instead. {^_^} ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:02:10 -0800 From: "jdow" <jdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: A question about procmailrc To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <0da701c62865$d8879550$1225a8c0@kittycat> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original From: "Hongwei Li" <hongwei@xxxxxxxxx> >> On 2/2/2006 12:10 PM, Hongwei Li wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>> >>> The * is a wild char because there are probably other letters after office, >>> e.g. . ] or space etc. I also tried: >>> >>> :0: >>> * ^Subject:.*is out of the office* >>> $MAILDIR/Trash >> >> * is not a wild card character. >> >> dot is a wild card character. >> >> When dot is followed by splat (.*) that means "zero or more anything" >> >> So, the above says match on "subject:' starting in column 1 >> followed by any number of characters (zero or more) >> followed by "is out of the office*" >> >> I'm not certain what that last asterisk does.... >> did you try: >> * ^subject:.*is out of the office.* >> >> note the ".*" at the end, and not just "*" >> >> Don >> > > Why does this work when the subject line has many other chars after FAILURE: That is the way procmail works. Does the search string exist within any line in the header or body? > # block junk mails from msnotes: > :0: > * ^Subject:.*DELIVERY FAILURE* Matches ^Subject: DELIVERY FAILUR, ^Subject: asda asda DELIVERY FAILUREEEE, and so forth. > $MAILDIR/Junk So that declares the MAILDIR value is defined, at least. > The real subject is something like: > DELIVERY FAILURE: 550 5.7.1 Message content rejected... > > I didn't use .*, but only * above. As an aesthetic thing this might process quicker: :0 h: * ^Subject:.*is out of the office $MAILDIR/Trash Does $MAILDIR/Trash exist? Is it locked by something else? Is it a directory or a file? (It should be the same kind of object as "Junk". And the suspicious mind I have wonders if Trash is a special name for something else that peers into that directory.) {^_^} ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:07:37 -0800 From: "jdow" <jdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: A question about procmailrc To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <0dab01c62866$9b7bb9b0$1225a8c0@kittycat> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original From: "Hongwei Li" <hongwei@xxxxxxxxx> >>> On 2/2/2006 12:10 PM, Hongwei Li wrote: >>> >>> [snip] >>> >>>> >>>> The * is a wild char because there are probably other letters after office, >>>> e.g. . ] or space etc. I also tried: >>>> >>>> :0: >>>> * ^Subject:.*is out of the office* >>>> $MAILDIR/Trash >>> >>> * is not a wild card character. >>> >>> dot is a wild card character. >>> >>> When dot is followed by splat (.*) that means "zero or more anything" >>> >>> So, the above says match on "subject:' starting in column 1 >>> followed by any number of characters (zero or more) >>> followed by "is out of the office*" >>> >>> I'm not certain what that last asterisk does.... >>> did you try: >>> * ^subject:.*is out of the office.* >>> >>> note the ".*" at the end, and not just "*" >>> >>> Don >>> >> >> Why does this work when the subject line has many other chars after FAILURE: >> >> # block junk mails from msnotes: >> :0: >> * ^Subject:.*DELIVERY FAILURE* >> $MAILDIR/Junk >> >> The real subject is something like: >> DELIVERY FAILURE: 550 5.7.1 Message content rejected... >> >> I didn't use .*, but only * above. >> >> Hongwei >> > > A strange thing: when I test, I clicked the "reply" or "Forward" for the junk > email I received earlier, so the new subject line has either Re: or [Fwd:, > i.e. the whole subject line is like: > > [Fwd: Aaa Bbbb/Cccc Dddd/Xxx Yyyy is out of.... > > or > > Re: Aaa Bbbb/Cccc Dddd/Xxx Yyyy is out of.... > > Then, my procmailrc does not work for that mail. If I remove Re: and [Fwd: > from the subject line, but keep all others there: > > Aaa Bbbb/Cccc Dddd/Xxx Yyyy is out of.... > > and send it to myself or other testing account, then it works -- using .* or * > at the end of that line in my procmailrc code! > > So, the Re: and [Fwd: in the subject line makes the code in procmailrc not > working. Why? Good question. "It's procmail" comes to mind. It might be this sort of thing that has people down on procmail. ^Subject:.*:*.*is out of the office I wonder if that one will work. Zero or more characters, zero or more colons, another zero or more characters, then the real string. One thing that comes to mind with Re: and Fwd: is that the actual message is placed inside mime quoting. So there might be two Subject lines present and that confuses things. {^_^} ------------------------------ Message: 12 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:33:55 -0800 From: Nifty Hat Mitch <mitch48@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: process memory limitations To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <20060203023355.GA16812@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:17:33AM +0200, Oded Maimon wrote: > Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:17:33 +0200 > From: Oded Maimon <oded.maimon@xxxxxxxxx> > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: process memory limitations > Reply-To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Hi, > > I've a question about per process memory allocation limitation. > > if i've a 32bit machine, with RHEL 4, what are the limitation of memory > that each process can allocate? > > > if i've a 64bit machine, with RHEL 4, and i'm using a 32bit program, > what are the limitation of memory that each process can allocate? Allocate, malloc(?), sbrk(), heap, stack.... What programming language? In general an signed int that lets you move +/_ inside something will put a 2GB limit on common objects and common programming practices. If you are concerned about bounds you need to write a test case that explores exactly what matters to you. Search engines like Google are your friend. https://www.redhat.com/en_us/USA/rhel/details/limits/ Tells me: Maximum x86 per-process virtual address space Version 2.1 Version 3 Version 4 3GB Approx 4GB Approx 4GB -- T o m M i t c h e l l Found me a new place to hang my hat :-) Found me a cable too. ------------------------------ Message: 13 Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:37:51 +0700 From: Fajar Priyanto <fajarpri@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RAID 5 with different size disks To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <200602030937.52171.fajarpri@xxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi all, Is it possible to setup a RAID 5 array using different size disks? Such as hda 9GB, hdb 36GB, hdc 40GB, hdd 80GB, hde 80GB. What are the impact and consequences? Thank you very much, -- Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | Linux tutorial http://linux2.arinet.org 09:36:07 up 1:42, 2.6.14-1.1653_FC4 GNU/Linux Let's use OpenOffice. http://www.openoffice.org ------------------------------ Message: 14 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:53:05 -0800 From: Nifty Hat Mitch <mitch48@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: ML-37 clock speed To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <20060203025305.GB16812@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 05:40:16PM +0000, Andy Green wrote: > Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:40:16 +0000 > From: Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAQMAAABtzGvEAAAABlBMVEUAAAD///+l2Z/dAAAA > CXBIWXMAAAsTAAALEwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH1QgcEB8sRzxF1wAAAO5JREFUGNMlj6FuAkEQhn8u > 3ANU4GlVU9NXOFGB3BBqalBNmmBxTWAlqSkadZKgEK1t7hFoAoYgcD1IGmqA5Jrt9J/ZFfPl251/ > JgvhcQBrWBr2IM7yTYSLoasTq+5UL1cDf030ugXt+CmsON3djjJgd9kGEV56fs6W/ZcfAa/H56JF > m4lHE/Ih285YNxRXmWLbcGb3TcXPTR7N3spoi0a02FmmtCBljfYrZZIZ1A6ygI/Q3CGv2VdyaPwv > h21w+gcJT3VDP4HG1ylRcQo7z0ukltugwJC5xKu92ZQqWjWxKfLoEp3yninkgQvFev4Brbazn0BT > QlUAAAAASUVORK5CYII= > Subject: Re: ML-37 clock speed > Reply-To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Neal Becker wrote: > > > Is this set dynamically? > > Yep > > service cpuspeed stop > > To kill it permanently > > chkconfig cpuspeed off Slightly better chkconfig --level 123456 cpuspeed off If you stop in level 1 for some reason cpuspeed can clock down the CPU then 'telinit 5' and you do not have cpuspeed to get you out of first gear. (what is a Nash Rambler ---). For most of us "chkconfig cpuspeed off" is just fine. > Be aware you are eating battery doing so. As soon as the processor is > stressed, it will crank up the clock while cpuspeed is active. Watch our for 'micro' benchmarks of any kind. They often do not run long enough to be noticed by cpuspeed. -- T o m M i t c h e l l Found me a new place to hang my hat :-) Found me a cable too. ------------------------------ Message: 15 Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:05:29 -0800 From: Peter Gordon <admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: CD/CDR Operation To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, wg5o@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <1138939529.3152.10.camel@tuxhugger> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 13:40 -0600, Andy Pickens wrote: > I have Fedora 4, Thunderbird, and Firefox working pretty well, except > for the CDs. if I try to mount a music CD on the CD reader, or a blank > CD on the CDR drive, I get the message: > > "Could not determine filesystem type, and none was specified." Audio CDs do not have filesystems (just the raw audio track data), so you cannot mount them. Please try gnome-cd (part of the gnome-media package). That will allow you to play the audio CD. You can rip the audio data to your hard disk using sound-juicer (assuming that it is legal for you to do that, of course). These are just two of the many CD playing/ripping applications available to choose from. A search via Yum should turn up many more should you want to look at those, as well. Hope that helps! -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) GnuPG Public Key: 0xDA3634D7 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060202/c471b06c/at tachment.bin ------------------------------ Message: 16 Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:55:55 -0800 From: Gordon Messmer <yinyang@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: RAID 5 with different size disks To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <43E2E25B.8030803@xxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Fajar Priyanto wrote: > Is it possible to setup a RAID 5 array using different size disks? Such as hda > 9GB, hdb 36GB, hdc 40GB, hdd 80GB, hde 80GB. > No, it isn't. RAID5, by design, requires units of the same size. ------------------------------ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 24, Issue 22 *******************************************
