Re: Spamassassin emails have wrong perms -- CC'ed to selinux list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Richard E Miles wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:53:25 -0600
Justin Willmert <justin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
I'm cc-ing this to the fedora-selinux-list. I think some of the problems may be applicable there.

OK, after some more testing, when I disable SELinux, many of the errors go away. First of all, I get rid of the error message saying user can not be found and with it the 'still running as root' error. Second, it is able to access the bayes_journal file (as long as normal unix permissions are right, which I've figured out). So I guess the problem is an SELinux issue which I can't solve. I'd attach some avc error messages, but I can't seem to find any. I've looked in maillog, secure, and messages, but nothing.
Have you looked in the audit log, where all such messages are usually found ?
/var/log/audit.log

Below is what showed up in audit/audit.log when I sent a message through
spamassassin. I'm _*really*_ rusty on SELinux...it's the one thing I
have to deal with quite often that I haven't been able to learn how to
use...it's so foreign to me. I've never looked in audit.log before: the
avc messages used to show up in messages, but now as far back as my logs
go, I don't have a single avc message. This all looks like jibberish to
me, so I need your guy's help.

Thanks,
Justin

    type=AVC msg=audit(1138596151.681:104174): avc:  denied  {
    name_connect } for  pid=23796 comm="spamd" dest=389
    scontext=root:system_r:spamd_t
    tcontext=system_u:object_r:ldap_port_t tclass=tcp_socket
    type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1138596151.681:104174): arch=40000003
    syscall=102 success=no exit=-13 a0=3 a1=bfb2dc20 a2=1229cb8 a3=7
    items=0 pid=23796 auid=600 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0
    sgid=0 fsgid=0 comm="spamd" exe="/usr/bin/perl"
    type=SOCKADDR msg=audit(1138596151.681:104174):
    saddr=02000185C0A801940000000000000000
    type=SOCKETCALL msg=audit(1138596151.681:104174): nargs=3 a0=7
    a1=9b1fe80 a2=10
    type=AVC msg=audit(1138596153.220:104175): avc:  denied  {
    name_connect } for  pid=23796 comm="spamd" dest=389
    scontext=root:system_r:spamd_t
    tcontext=system_u:object_r:ldap_port_t tclass=tcp_socket
    type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1138596153.220:104175): arch=40000003
    syscall=102 success=no exit=-13 a0=3 a1=bfb2dc20 a2=1229cb8 a3=7
    items=0 pid=23796 auid=600 uid=0 gid=0 euid=99 suid=0 fsuid=99
    egid=99 sgid=0 fsgid=99 comm="spamd" exe="/usr/bin/perl"
    type=SOCKADDR msg=audit(1138596153.220:104175):
    saddr=02000185C0A801940000000000000000
    type=SOCKETCALL msg=audit(1138596153.220:104175): nargs=3 a0=7
    a1=9b6a6f0 a2=10
    type=AVC msg=audit(1138596160.388:104176): avc:  denied  {
    name_connect } for  pid=23797 comm="spamd" dest=389
    scontext=root:system_r:spamd_t
    tcontext=system_u:object_r:ldap_port_t tclass=tcp_socket
    type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1138596160.388:104176): arch=40000003
    syscall=102 success=no exit=-13 a0=3 a1=bfb2dc20 a2=1229cb8 a3=7
    items=0 pid=23797 auid=600 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0
    sgid=0 fsgid=0 comm="spamd" exe="/usr/bin/perl"
    type=SOCKADDR msg=audit(1138596160.388:104176):
    saddr=02000185C0A801940000000000000000
    type=SOCKETCALL msg=audit(1138596160.388:104176): nargs=3 a0=7
    a1=9b20050 a2=10
    type=AVC msg=audit(1138596164.032:104177): avc:  denied  {
    name_connect } for  pid=23797 comm="spamd" dest=389
    scontext=root:system_r:spamd_t
    tcontext=system_u:object_r:ldap_port_t tclass=tcp_socket
    type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1138596164.032:104177): arch=40000003
    syscall=102 success=no exit=-13 a0=3 a1=bfb2dc20 a2=1229cb8 a3=7
    items=0 pid=23797 auid=600 uid=0 gid=0 euid=99 suid=0 fsuid=99
    egid=99 sgid=0 fsgid=99 comm="spamd" exe="/usr/bin/perl"
    type=SOCKADDR msg=audit(1138596164.032:104177):
    saddr=02000185C0A801940000000000000000
    type=SOCKETCALL msg=audit(1138596164.032:104177): nargs=3 a0=7
    a1=9b84af0 a2=10

I get these also on my system. So you're not the only one. Is there a fix for this?

Ok I have placed an updated version of policy on my people page. It will be in rawhide tonight.

ftp://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/Fedora

But you can solve these problems yourself by using audit2allow and loadable modules.

If you ran

audit2allow -M gives me:

   unknown option, '-M'

   audit2allow [-d] [-v] [-l] [-i <inputfile> ] [-o <outputfile>]
           -d      read input from output of /bin/dmesg
           -v      verbose output
           -l      read input only after last "load_policy"
           -i      read input from <inputfile>
           -o      append output to <outputfile>

Are modules only a function in FC5test2 right now (I'm running FC4 just in case you didn't know that)?
audit2allow -M spamd /var/log/audit/audit.log

You would have seen something like this.

 audit2allow -M spamd -i /var/log/audit/audit.log
Generating type enforcment file: spamd.te
Compiling policy: checkmodule -M -m -o spamd.mod spamd.te
semodule_package -o spamd.pp -m spamd.mod
Building package: semodule_package -o spamd.pp -m spamd.mod

******************** IMPORTANT ***********************

In order to load this newly created policy package into the kernel,
you are required to execute

semodule -i spamd.pp
If you then ran the semodue -i spamd.pp

I don't have a semodule program (either in path or with a search of all files)
it should fix your problem.

This is the te file that audit2allow created
module spamd 1.0;

require {
        role object_r;
        role system_r;

        class tcp_socket name_connect;

        type ldap_port_t;
        type spamd_t;
 };


allow spamd_t ldap_port_t:tcp_socket name_connect;

When policy gets updated with your fix, you could remove this loadable module with the command
semodule -r slapd

semodule -l

will list all of your loadable modules.
Same problem as above.

Thanks for the help, Dan. I guess I'll just wait until the next policy release. I'll make sure to remember the commands for when I do go to FC5 and can use these. I still have problems with dovecot and selinux (right now I have a boolean set unenforcing dovecot. I've never dug far enough to make a bug report worthwhile. It's probably half my fault anyway) and it would have been a lot of help for other things I've had to work around.

Thanks for the help,
Justin


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux