Re: OT: Email signing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: mhw@xxxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: OT: Email signing
From: Anne Wilson <cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:58:19 +0000
Cc:
In-reply-to: <1138740217.6573.27.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <16de708d0601301914w441e508cg303a4fe6531efcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1138739542.6573.16.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1138740217.6573.27.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.8

On Tuesday 31 Jan 2006 20:43, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Message was signed with key 0x1E3CC7593760ABB4.
>  
> Status: Bad signature.
>   Message was signed by 73517.757@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Key ID:
> 0xE1C94B46DF1DD471). The signature is valid, but the key's validity
> is unknown.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302 (http://counter.li.org/)

Attachment: pgpmaofmf7jl7.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- OT: Email signing
  - From: Arthur Pemberton
- Re: OT: Email signing
  - From: Michael H. Warfield
- Re: OT: Email signing
  - From: Michael H. Warfield

Prev by Date: hylafax
Next by Date: Re: OT: Email signing
Previous by thread: Re: OT: Email signing
Next by thread: Re: OT: Email signing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]