Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:14:58PM -0500, Adam Gibson wrote:
> http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060113-5975.html
>
> From all the reading I have done it seems that configuration would be
> much easier for most system admins. A utility can learn what access is
> needed by monitoring the app so that you don't have to know all the
> details of what the app touches to get it working for new apps.
For one thing it needs kernel patches that aren't upstream, which makes
it unlikely. Given it duplicates a subset of SELinux functionality,
it seems somewhat pointless to divide our efforts on two solutions
to the same problem instead of improving the one that upstream has
already chosen.
If Red Hatters are monitoring the opposition, they will already know
about AppArmour.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/
do not reply off-list
