Re: Flushing the IP routing table

• To: FC Rel <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Flushing the IP routing table
• From: Chasecreek Systemhouse <chasecreek.systemhouse@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:51:50 -0500
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=p46fOQmX/jpXIdUVxOfQvdGJHulAks5/H7jHK5CfGG6pT4crx9hSWQUh15C+PEyY++AeTwmF53BNx9pZy82/6w1Qp8fR4OWfts4OJbrLBW2lh6V5DhdlqmNv80VhqmSVyrdliTKp5Fq2jRlEuuTHcN/x2EBJgm8vGtURSjmldXA=
• In-reply-to: <1137076975.1518.18.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <00a101c61784$03fb4a80$b700a8c0@sparky> <1137076975.1518.18.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On 1/12/06, John Austin <ja@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Odd looking netmask !!!! on first entry
> Should it be 255.255.255.0 ?

255.255.252.0 is a sub-netting mask.
--
WC -Sx- Jones | http://ccsh.us/ | Open Source Consulting

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Flushing the IP routing table
    • From: Neil Cherry

• References:
  • RE: Flushing the IP routing table
    • From: Chris Norman
  • RE: Flushing the IP routing table
    • From: John Austin

• Prev by Date: Network Startup Error Message
• Next by Date: RE: Ouch!
• Previous by thread: RE: Flushing the IP routing table
• Next by thread: Re: Flushing the IP routing table
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread