Re: Is Anyone Using Alternate I/O Schedulers?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Is Anyone Using Alternate I/O Schedulers?
From: Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:10:38 +0530
In-reply-to: <20060105112336.414736ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20060105112336.414736ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050921 Red Hat/1.7.12-1.4.1

David Cary Hart wrote:

"Anticipatory" is the default but both Deadline and CFQ are compiled into the
stock kernels.

CFQ has been Fedora default for a relatively long time. This articlemight be of interesthttp://www.redhat.com/magazine/008jun05/features/schedulers/

References:
- Is Anyone Using Alternate I/O Schedulers?
  - From: David Cary Hart

Prev by Date: Re: converting php files to xml on FC3
Next by Date: unbelievably stupid mistake - i broke /usr/lib need help
Previous by thread: Re: Is Anyone Using Alternate I/O Schedulers?
Next by thread: question about "at"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]