Tim wrote:
On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 18:27 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
What I *did* claim is that ext3 is subject to fragmentation.
The "so what" answer is probably the best answer that you're going to
If you actually bothered to read what went before, you'd see
that is response is malapropos.
[snip]
I don't worry about fragmentation any more than I worry about other
technicalities of how the data is put onto the drive.
Arguing against claims I haven't made.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
